|
|
|
@ -28,58 +28,74 @@ |
|
|
|
and all this hype about remote control through a 9P service, I only |
|
|
|
want to manage my windows in a simple, but dynamic way. wmii never got |
|
|
|
finished because I listened to users, who proposed arbitrary ideas I |
|
|
|
considered useful. This resulted in an extreme <a href="http://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.html">CADT</a> |
|
|
|
development model, which was a mistake. Thus the philosophy of |
|
|
|
dwm is simply <i>to fit my needs</i> (maybe yours as well). That's it. |
|
|
|
considered useful. This resulted in an extreme <a |
|
|
|
href="http://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.html">CADT</a> development model, |
|
|
|
which was a mistake. Thus the philosophy of dwm is simply <i>to fit my |
|
|
|
needs</i> (maybe yours as well). That's it. |
|
|
|
</p> |
|
|
|
<h3>Differences to wmii</h3 |
|
|
|
<h3>Differences to ion, larswm, and wmii</h3> |
|
|
|
<p> |
|
|
|
In contrast to wmii, dwm is only a window manager, and nothing else. |
|
|
|
Hence, it is much smaller, faster and simpler. |
|
|
|
In contrast to ion, larswm, and wmii, dwm is much smaller, faster and simpler. |
|
|
|
</p> |
|
|
|
<ul> |
|
|
|
<li> |
|
|
|
dwm has no 9P support, no editable tagbars, no shell-based |
|
|
|
configuration and remote control and comes without any additional |
|
|
|
tools like printing the selection or warping the mouse. |
|
|
|
dwm has no Lua integration, no 9P support, no menu, no editable |
|
|
|
tagbars, no shell-based configuration, no remote control, and comes |
|
|
|
without any additional tools like printing the selection or warping |
|
|
|
the mouse. |
|
|
|
</li> |
|
|
|
<li> |
|
|
|
dwm is only a single binary, it's source code is intended to never |
|
|
|
exceed 2000 SLOC. |
|
|
|
</li> |
|
|
|
<li> |
|
|
|
dwm is customized through editing its source code, that makes it |
|
|
|
extremely fast and secure - it does not process any input data which |
|
|
|
hasn't been known at compile time, except window title names. |
|
|
|
dwm is based on tagging and dynamic window management (however |
|
|
|
simpler than ion, wmii or larswm). It manages windows in |
|
|
|
tiling and floating modes. Either mode can be applied dynamically, |
|
|
|
depending on the application in use and the task performed. |
|
|
|
</li> |
|
|
|
<li> |
|
|
|
dwm is based on tagging and dynamic window management (however simpler |
|
|
|
than wmii or larswm). |
|
|
|
dwm don't distinguishes between layers, there is no floating or |
|
|
|
tiled layer. Wether the clients of currently selected tag are in |
|
|
|
tiled mode or not, you can re-arrange all clients on the fly. |
|
|
|
Popup- and fixed-size windows are treated floating, however. |
|
|
|
</li> |
|
|
|
<li> |
|
|
|
dwm don't distinguishes between layers, there is no floating or |
|
|
|
managed layer. Wether the clients of currently selected tag are |
|
|
|
managed or not, you can re-arrange all clients on the fly. Popup- |
|
|
|
and fixed-size windows are treated unmanaged. |
|
|
|
dwm is customized through editing its source code, that makes it |
|
|
|
extremely fast and secure - it does not process any input data |
|
|
|
which hasn't been known at compile time, except window title names |
|
|
|
and status text read from standard input. You don't have to learn |
|
|
|
Lua/sh/ruby or some weird configuration file format (like X |
|
|
|
resource files), beside C to customize it for your needs, |
|
|
|
you <b>only</b> have to learn C. |
|
|
|
</li> |
|
|
|
<li> |
|
|
|
Because dwm is customized through editing its source code, it's |
|
|
|
pointless to make binary packages of it. This keeps its userbase |
|
|
|
small and elitist. No novices asking stupid questions. |
|
|
|
</li> |
|
|
|
<li> |
|
|
|
dwm uses 1-pixel borders to provide the maximum of screen real |
|
|
|
estate to clients. Small titlebars are only drawn in front of unfocused |
|
|
|
clients. |
|
|
|
estate to clients. Small titlebars are only drawn in front of |
|
|
|
unfocused clients. |
|
|
|
</li> |
|
|
|
<li> |
|
|
|
dwm reads from <b>stdin</b> to print arbitrary status text (like the |
|
|
|
date, load, battery charge). That's much simpler than larsremote, |
|
|
|
wmiir and what not... |
|
|
|
dwm reads from standard input to print arbitrary status text (like |
|
|
|
the date, load, battery charge). That's much simpler than |
|
|
|
larsremote, wmiir and what not... |
|
|
|
</li> |
|
|
|
<li> |
|
|
|
Anselm <b>does not</b> want any feedback to dwm. If you ask for support, |
|
|
|
feature requests, or if you report bugs, they will be <b>ignored</b> |
|
|
|
with a high chance. dwm is only intended to fit Anselms needs. |
|
|
|
However you are free to download and distribute/relicense it, with the |
|
|
|
conditions of the <a href="http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/dwm?f=f10eb1139362;file=LICENSE;style=raw">MIT/X Consortium license</a>. |
|
|
|
dwm is only intended to fit Anselms needs. That means, Anselm |
|
|
|
<b>does not</b> want feedback to dwm. If you ask for support, |
|
|
|
feature requests, or if you report "bugs" (<i>real bugs are welcome |
|
|
|
though</i>), they will be <b>ignored</b> with a high |
|
|
|
chance. However you are free to download and distribute/relicense |
|
|
|
it, with the conditions of the <a |
|
|
|
href="http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/dwm?f=f10eb1139362;file=LICENSE;style=raw">MIT/X Consortium license</a>. |
|
|
|
</li> |
|
|
|
</ul> |
|
|
|
<h3>Documentation</h3> |
|
|
|
There is a <a href="http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/man/man2html?query=dwm">man page</a>. |
|
|
|
<h3>Screenshot</h3> |
|
|
|
<p> |
|
|
|
<a href="http://wmii.de/shots/dwm-20060714.png">Click here for a screenshot</a> (20060714) |
|
|
|
|
Anselm R. Garbe
18 years ago